Author(s): Husnija HASANBEGOVIÄ, Esad H. MahmutoviÄ, Naim SalkiÄ
Signal language can be used trough realization of educational contents in educational process, as stand alone language or as accessory in depended of communication type that is preferred by children. By knowing of theoretical guidelines, methodical admittances, knowing the signal language and positive relation to its usage by teachers, children and personnel is the most important for success of educational process and socialization of deaf and hard of hearing children. For detecting the competence of experts in regular and special schools in process of educational and social integration of deaf children that work hypothesis about presence of statistically important differences between teachers in regular and special schools for deaf children has been put, when we talk about competence and relation to communication and integration of deaf children. The sample has been consisted of experts that directly work with deaf children (N=91). The sample has been divided to two sub samples. One sub sample has been consisted of teachers in special institutions for education and rehabilitation of deaf children with hearing impaired (n =57), and second sample, regular school teachers (n = 34). For research needs, it has been constructed the measuring instrument which is consisted of 23 defined statements – variables, which intentionally examine theoretical knowledge, practice experience and relation to signal language of experts that work with hearing impaired children. Results measuring, has been done by Liker’s type scale, which is consisted of 5 categories (totally agree, mostly agree, can not decide, mostly not agree totally disagree). For importance consolidating of differences of estimated tested sub samples, it has been done canonic discriminative analysis in latent space of changeable variables. Statistical importance of differences between sub samples of tested in this work has been done on level 0, 01.
The Journal of International Social Research received 8982 citations as per Google Scholar report
