Author(s): Betül MUTLU
Critical approaches in Turkish Literature diverse commonly in two main strips as Subjective-Observational and Objective-Disciplinary. Contrary to the Objective approach that prioritizes the assessment of the work from a distance by its exclusion of individual enthusiasm, in Subjective criticism, terms such as plaudit, emotion or intuition appear as integrating.Although this two distinct way of elaboration indicates essential differences in the conduct, there is a presence of such critics, whom at the beginning of their careers observed with a tendency towards observational criticism that in the latter, either paved towards objectivity or included the aspects of both approaches in their studies. Mustafa Öne?, who also is a poet, has had a synthesizing understanding put into the display in literary criticism within his unique styling, providing with a merge for both subjective and objective approaches while enriching them through his poetic sensibility, cultural inheritance and rhetoric. In this study, percipience and the components of critical framework of Mustafa Öne?, in regard to his critical studies, had sought to be determined.
The Journal of International Social Research received 8982 citations as per Google Scholar report