Book Review - (2024) Volume 17, Issue 113

A Comprehensive Assessment of the Research on the Psychological and Social Aspects that Influence Police Officers' Choices to Use Force
Tessa der Scheer*
 
Department of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands
 
*Correspondence: Tessa der Scheer, Department of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands, Email:

Received: Jun 01, 2024, Manuscript No. jisr-24-141409; Editor assigned: Jun 03, 2024, Pre QC No. jisr-24-141409; Reviewed: Jun 17, 2024, QC No. jisr-24-141409; Revised: Jun 21, 2024, Manuscript No. jisr-24-141409; Published: Jun 28, 2024, DOI: 10.17719/jisr.2024. 141409

Abstract

The use of force by police officers remains a highly controversial and critical issue within law enforcement and public safety. This comprehensive assessment explores the multifaceted psychological and social aspects that influence police officers' decisions to use force. By reviewing existing literature and empirical studies, this article aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the factors that shape these critical decisions. The assessment includes an analysis of individual psychological traits, situational variables, organizational culture, and societal influences. Ultimately, this research aims to inform policy recommendations and training programs that promote ethical and effective policing practices.

Keywords

Police Use of force; Psychological influences; Social influences; Personality traits; Stress and mental health; Police training

Introduction

The decision to use force is one of the most significant and scrutinized actions a police officer can take. It not only affects the immediate situation but also has far-reaching implications for community trust, public safety, and the overall perception of law enforcement agencies. Understanding the psychological and social aspects that influence these decisions is essential for developing strategies to minimize unnecessary force and improve police-community relations. This article examines the existing body of research on the psychological and social determinants of police use of force. By synthesizing findings from various studies, this comprehensive assessment aims to provide a holistic view of the factors that contribute to an officer's decision-making process.

Psychological Factors

Personality Traits

Personality traits play a crucial role in shaping an officer's behavior and decision-making. Research has shown that certain traits, such as aggression, impulsivity, and authoritarianism, are associated with a higher likelihood of using force. Conversely, traits like empathy, emotional stability, and conscientiousness can mitigate the propensity to use force.

Stress and Mental Health

The high-stress nature of police work significantly impacts officers' mental health and decision-making. Chronic exposure to stress can lead to conditions such as PTSD, anxiety, and depression, which in turn can influence an officer's judgment and reactions in high-pressure situations. Effective stress management and mental health support are critical in reducing the likelihood of excessive force.

Training and Experience

Training programs that emphasize de-escalation techniques, conflict resolution, and cultural competence can equip officers with the skills needed to handle situations without resorting to force. Additionally, an officer's experience, including their exposure to various types of incidents and their outcomes, shapes their decision-making process. Experienced officers who have successfully managed conflicts without force are more likely to repeat such behavior.

Social Factors

Organizational Culture

The culture within a police department significantly influences officers' behavior. A culture that implicitly or explicitly condones the use of force can lead to more frequent and severe incidents. Conversely, a culture that prioritizes accountability, transparency, and community engagement can reduce the occurrence of unnecessary force.

Peer Influence

The attitudes and behaviors of fellow officers can impact an individual's decisions. Peer pressure, the desire for acceptance, and fear of ostracism can lead officers to conform to group norms, even if those norms include the inappropriate use of force. Conversely, positive peer influence can encourage restraint and adherence to ethical standards.

Community Relations

The relationship between the police and the community they serve is a crucial factor. In communities where trust and cooperation are high, officers are less likely to encounter resistance and more likely to employ non-violent conflict resolution methods. In contrast, in communities with strained relations, officers June feel threatened and resort to force more readily.

Situational Factors

Incident Characteristics

The specific circumstances of an incident, such as the presence of a weapon, the behavior of the suspect, and the immediate threat level, are critical determinants of an officer's decision to use force. Situational awareness and the ability to accurately assess these factors are essential for appropriate decision-making.

Environmental Context

The environment in which an incident occurs, including factors like time of day, location, and presence of bystanders, can influence an officer's perception of threat and their subsequent actions. For example, high-crime areas or situations with large, agitated crowds June increase the perceived need for force.

Policy Implications and Recommendations

Enhancing Training Programs

Training should focus on developing officers' emotional intelligence, stress management skills, and cultural competence. Incorporating scenario-based training that reflects real-life situations can improve decision-making under pressure.

Promoting Positive Organizational Culture

Police departments should strive to create a culture of accountability, transparency, and community-oriented policing. Leadership plays a crucial role in setting the tone and expectations for behavior within the department.

Strengthening Community Engagement

Building trust and cooperation with the community can reduce the likelihood of confrontational encounters. Community policing initiatives, open dialogue, and partnership programs can foster better relationships and mutual understanding.

Providing Mental Health Support

Access to mental health resources, including counseling and stress management programs, is essential for maintaining officers' well-being and ensuring sound decision-making in the field.

Conclusion

The decision to use force is influenced by a complex interplay of psychological and social factors. By understanding these influences, law enforcement agencies can develop more effective policies and training programs to promote ethical and effective policing. This comprehensive assessment highlights the importance of addressing individual traits, organizational culture, situational variables, and community relations in efforts to reduce the use of unnecessary force and improve police-community relations. Future research should continue to explore these factors and their interactions, with an emphasis on evidence-based practices and interventions that support both officers and the communities they serve.

References

  1. Thiébaut R, Thiessard F (2017)Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics. Year Med Inform 26: 248-250.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Flahault A, Geissbuhler A, Guesses I, Guerin P J, Bolton I, et al. (2017)Precision global health in the digital age. Swiss Med Wkly 147:14423.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Steinhubl S R, Muse E D, Topol E J (2015)The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med 7(283): 283.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Kagashe I, Yan Z, Suheryani I. (2017)Enhancing seasonal influenza surveillance: Topic analysis of widely used medicinal drugs using twitter data. J Med Internet Res 19:1-14.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Kang G J, Ewing-Nelson S R, Mackey L, Schlitt J T, Marathe A, et al. (2017)Semantic network analysis of vaccine sentiment in online social media. Vaccine 35: 3621-3638.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Allison YL, Melissa WK, Heather EM (2021)Telemedicine for neuro-ophthalmology: challenges and opportunities. Curr Opin Neurol 34: 61-66.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Venkatesh SM, Aliasgar M, Amrutha BN, Vikram S, Prakash S (2021)A Questionnaire-based Survey of Clinical Neuro-oncological Practice in India. Neurol India 69: 659-664.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Marcello M, Roberta L, Vincenzo BM, Simona B, Gioacchino T, et al. (2020)Assessing disability and relapses in multiple sclerosis on tele-neurology. Neurol Sci 41: 1369-1371.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Kimberly DB, Charlotte EJ, Stacy LP, Heather EM (2020)Evolution of the Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology and the Clinical Ophthalmology Literature: A 20-Year Retrospective. J Neuroophthalmol 40: 141-143.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Heather EM, Charlotte EJ, Daniel SR, Steven R (2019)Big Data Research in Neuro-Ophthalmology: Promises and Pitfalls. J Neuroophthalmol 39: 480-486.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Announcements

You can send your paper at Online Submission System

  • The Journal of International Social Research / Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi ISSN: 1307-9581, an international, peer-reviewed, on the web publication, from 2007 will be issued least four times annualy.
  • Our journal is an independent academic publication based on research in social sciences, contributing to its field and trying to publish scientific articles that will bring innovation to the original and social sciences.
  • The journal has got an international editorial board and referee board, mainly embodied from the each individually professional on the social research fields.
  • Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / The Journal of International Social Research became a member of Cross Reff since 2014 and started to assign DOI numbers to the articles. image
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 8982

The Journal of International Social Research received 8982 citations as per Google Scholar report

The Journal of International Social Research peer review process verified by publons
Get the App