A Global Exploration of Modernization, Anthropomorphism, and Wildlife Values

Alamrani Samia^* Department of Classics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, USA
^*Correspondence: Alamrani Samia, Department of Classics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, USA, Email:

Received: Jul 03, 2023, Manuscript No. jisr-23-108738; Editor assigned: Jul 05, 2023, Pre QC No. jisr-23-108738; Reviewed: Jul 19, 2023, QC No. jisr-23-108738; Revised: Jul 25, 2023, Manuscript No. jisr-23-108738; Published: Aug 31, 2023, DOI: 10.17719/jisr.2023.108738

Introduction

The relationship between humans and wildlife has evolved significantly over time, shaped by cultural, social, and environmental factors. As societies progress through modernization, their attitudes towards wildlife also undergo transformation. This article presents a comprehensive exploration of the interconnections between modernization, anthropomorphism, and wildlife values on a global scale. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for promoting wildlife conservation and fostering sustainable human-wildlife coexistence in the modern world.

Mutualism orientations, for instance, are thought to be higher in females and in individuals living in more urban areas, as compared with males and individuals from more rural areas.

Recently, researchers have proposed that an increase in modernization, a broad term including economic wealth, urbanization and formal education, might have caused a change in the relationship between humans and wildlife, by altering human orientations, attitude and behaviours toward wildlife. In particular, modernization has led people in post-industrial countries to experience increased loneliness and social isolation, but also less frequent encounters with wildlife and thus a more benign and less conflictive association with animals. According to this hypothesis, the tendency to attribute human mental or physical characteristics to other entities, further fostered by an affective relationship with pets, would have enhanced human empathy and perception of similarity with other species. In turn, this would have led humans to switch from domination to mutualism orientations, and to more positive attitudes and behaviours toward animals

Modernization and its impact on wildlife

Modernization is characterized by technological advancements, urbanization, and changes in lifestyle and values. As societies transition from agrarian to industrial and digital economies, their interactions with wildlife also change. Rapid urbanization often leads to habitat fragmentation and encroachment, affecting wildlife populations and their ecosystems. Moreover, modern lifestyles may disconnect people from the natural world, reducing their direct experiences with wildlife.

Anthropomorphism: seeing ourselves in wildlife

Anthropomorphism refers to the human tendency to ascribe human characteristics, emotions, and intentions to animals. This cognitive process influences how humans perceive and interact with wildlife. In the context of modernization, anthropomorphism can take various forms, such as portraying wildlife as cute or cuddly in media and popular culture, attributing human-like thoughts to animals, or ascribing them with personalities and emotions.

Anthropomorphism can have both positive and negative implications for wildlife conservation. On one hand, it can foster empathy and concern for animals, leading to increased support for conservation efforts. On the other hand, it may lead to misunderstandings about animal behavior and needs, potentially impacting their welfare and survival.

Wildlife values and conservation

The values that societies place on wildlife play a crucial role in determining the level of conservation efforts. Traditional and indigenous cultures often exhibit strong connections to wildlife, viewing them as integral parts of their spiritual and ecological systems. However, as societies modernize, their values towards wildlife may shift, leading to varied attitudes and levels of concern for their conservation.

Understanding the factors that shape wildlife values is essential for designing effective conservation strategies that resonate with diverse cultural contexts. Modernization can influence these values by altering people's perceptions of wildlife, their awareness of conservation issues, and their willingness to support conservation initiatives.

Case studies from different regions

To gain a holistic perspective, this article examines case studies from diverse regions across the globe. It explores how various cultures approach wildlife in the face of modernization. Some cultures may prioritize wildlife conservation and foster harmonious coexistence, while others may prioritize economic development at the expense of wildlife habitats.

Implications and recommendations

The global exploration of modernization, anthropomorphism, and wildlife values yields valuable insights for wildlife conservation efforts. Recognizing the cultural context in conservation planning is vital to developing inclusive and effective strategies that align with local values and priorities.

Educational initiatives and media campaigns can play a crucial role in fostering wildlife appreciation and empathy while dispelling anthropomorphic misconceptions. By promoting meaningful interactions with wildlife, such as ecotourism and community-based conservation initiatives, societies can reconnect with the natural world despite modernization.

Conclusion

The complex interplay between modernization, anthropomorphism, and wildlife values underscores the need for culturally sensitive and context-specific approaches to wildlife conservation. By understanding the diverse perspectives and attitudes towards wildlife, societies can find common ground to protect and preserve biodiversity for future generations. Embracing both traditional wisdom and modern knowledge will be instrumental in forging a sustainable path towards harmonious coexistence with wildlife in the modern world.

References

1. Harold Bloom, Blake Hobby, eds. (2009).The American Dream .New York, NY: Bloom's Literary Criticism.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

2. Hayley Haugen M (2010).The American Dream in John Steinbeck's of Mice and Men. Uk: Green heaven Press.

Google Scholar

3. Hobsbawm, Eric, Terence Ranger, eds. (2009).The Invention of Tradition. New York: Cambridge UP.

Google Scholar

4. Huang Nian-Sheng, Carla Mulford (2008). Benjamin Franklin and the American Dream. The Cambridge Companion to Benjamin Franklin. Ed. Carla Mulford. New York: Cambridge UP. 145-58.

Google Scholar

5. LeoLemay JA (1986). Franklin's Autobiography and the American Dream.  JA Leo Lemay and PM Zall, eds.Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography(Norton Critical Editions, 1986) pp.349–360.

Google Scholar

6. Jacobson, MF (1998). Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

7. Jacoby, Tamar (2004). What It Means to Be American in the 21st Century. Reinventing the Melting Pot: The New Immigrants and What It Means to Be American.Ed. Tamar Jacoby. New York: Basic, 2004. 293-314.

Google Scholar

8. James Miller E (1974). My Antonia and the American Dream.Prairie Schooner48 (2):112–123.

Google Scholar

9. James Henry (1907).TheAmericanScene. London: Granville Publishing Jeremi, Suri. (2008). Henry Kissinger, the American Dream, and the Jewish Immigrant Experience in the Cold War.Diplomatic History. 32 (5):719–747.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref

10. Kallen Horace (1998). Democracy versusthe Melting Pot. 1915. Culture and Democracy in the United States: Studies in the Group Psychology of the American Peoples. Introd. Stephen Whitfield. New Brunswick: Transactions. 59-117.

Google Scholar