Abstract

The integration of new health information technologies (HIT) in healthcare systems is pivotal for improving patient care and operational efficiency. However, the adoption and utilization of these technologies among nurses are influenced by various factors, including peer opinions. This study investigates the impact of peer opinions on nurses' usage of new HIT through a social network analysis (SNA) approach. By examining the social interactions and influence patterns within a nursing staff network, the research aims to identify key influencers and the extent to which their opinions shape technology adoption behaviors. Findings suggest that positive peer opinions significantly enhance the adoption rates of HIT among nurses, while negative opinions or resistance from influential peers can hinder this process. The study provides valuable insights for healthcare administrators and policymakers to strategize effective implementation and support mechanisms for HIT.

Keywords

Health Information Technologies (HIT); Nurses; Peer opinions; Social network analysis (SNA); Technology adoption

Introduction

The adoption of new health information technologies (HIT) in healthcare settings promises substantial improvements in patient care, workflow efficiency, and overall healthcare outcomes. However, the successful implementation of these technologies is contingent upon the willingness and ability of healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, to integrate them into their daily practices. Social influences, especially peer opinions, play a crucial role in shaping the attitudes and behaviors of nurses towards new technologies. This study employs social network analysis (SNA) to explore how opinions within a nursing staff network impact the adoption peer and usage of new HIT. SNA provides a robust framework for mapping and analyzing the relationships and interactions among individuals, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of influence dynamics.

Literature review

Health information technologies in nursing

HIT encompasses a wide range of digital tools and systems designed to enhance healthcare delivery, including electronic health records (EHR), clinical decision support systems (CDSS), and telemedicine platforms. The adoption of HIT among nurses has been associated with improved documentation accuracy, enhanced communication, and better patient outcomes.

Social network analysis in healthcare

SNA has been increasingly utilized in healthcare research to investigate the structural and functional aspects of social networks among healthcare professionals. It provides insights into how information flows, how influence is exerted, and how social ties impact professional behaviors.

Peer influence in technology adoption

Peer influence is a critical factor in the diffusion of innovations, particularly in professional settings. Nurses often rely on their peers for advice, support, and validation when adopting new practices. Positive peer opinions can facilitate the acceptance of new technologies, while negative opinions can lead to resistance and non-compliance.

Methodology

Study design

This study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative SNA with qualitative interviews. The study was conducted in a mid-sized hospital with a nursing staff of 120. Data collection involved surveys, network mapping, and semi-structured interviews.

Data collection

Surveys

A structured survey was administered to collect data on nurses' demographics, their usage of new HIT, and their perceptions of peer opinions regarding these technologies.

Network mapping

SNA tools were used to map the social network of the nursing staff. Nurses were asked to identify their key professional contacts within the hospital and rate the influence of these contacts on their professional practices.

Interviews

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subset of nurses identified as key influencers and adopters. The interviews explored their experiences, attitudes towards HIT, and the role of peer opinions in their technology usage.

Data analysis

Quantitative data from surveys and network mapping were analyzed using SNA software to identify network structure, centrality measures, and influence patterns. Qualitative data from interviews were thematically analyzed to provide context and depth to the quantitative findings.

Results

Network structure and key influencers

The SNA revealed a highly interconnected network with several central nodes representing key influencers. These influencers were characterized by high degree centrality and betweenness centrality, indicating their pivotal role in information dissemination and influence within the network.

Impact of peer opinions on hit usage

Quantitative analysis showed a significant correlation between positive peer opinions and the frequency of HIT usage among nurses. Nurses who received positive feedback and encouragement from influential peers were more likely to adopt and consistently use new technologies.

Qualitative insights from interviews highlighted that nurses often looked up to their peers for guidance and reassurance when adopting new HIT. Positive experiences shared by peers reduced anxiety and uncertainty, facilitating smoother integration of the technologies into daily routines.

Barriers to adoption

Negative peer opinions and resistance from key influencers were identified as major barriers to HIT adoption. Nurses reported hesitancy and reluctance to use new technologies when influential peers expressed skepticism or dissatisfaction with the systems.

Discussion

The findings underscore the critical role of peer opinions in shaping nurses' adoption of new HIT. Positive peer influence can act as a catalyst for successful technology integration, while negative influence can significantly impede this process. Healthcare administrators should leverage these insights to design targeted interventions that engage key influencers and promote positive peer interactions.

Implications for practice

1. Engaging Key Influencers: Identifying and engaging key influencers within the nursing network can accelerate HIT adoption. Training and supporting these influencers can create a positive ripple effect throughout the network.
2. Peer Support Programs: Establishing peer support programs where experienced users mentor and support their colleagues can enhance confidence and competence in using new technologies.
3. Addressing Negative Opinions: Proactively addressing concerns and negative opinions expressed by influential peers through dialogue and additional training can mitigate resistance and foster a more supportive environment for HIT adoption.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that peer opinions within a nursing staff network significantly impact the adoption and usage of new health information technologies. By employing social network analysis, the research highlights the importance of positive peer influence and the need to address negative opinions to ensure successful technology integration. The insights gained can inform strategies for effective HIT implementation, ultimately improving healthcare delivery and outcomes.

References

1. Thiébaut R, Thiessard F (2017)Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics. Year Med Inform 26: 248-250.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Flahault A, Geissbuhler A, Guesses I, Guerin P J, Bolton I, et al. (2017)Precision global health in the digital age. Swiss Med Wkly 147:14423.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Steinhubl S R, Muse E D, Topol E J (2015)The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med 7(283): 283.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Kagashe I, Yan Z, Suheryani I. (2017)Enhancing seasonal influenza surveillance: Topic analysis of widely used medicinal drugs using twitter data. J Med Internet Res 19:1-14.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Kang G J, Ewing-Nelson S R, Mackey L, Schlitt J T, Marathe A, et al. (2017)Semantic network analysis of vaccine sentiment in online social media. Vaccine 35: 3621-3638.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Allison YL, Melissa WK, Heather EM (2021)Telemedicine for neuro-ophthalmology: challenges and opportunities. Curr Opin Neurol 34: 61-66.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Venkatesh SM, Aliasgar M, Amrutha BN, Vikram S, Prakash S (2021)A Questionnaire-based Survey of Clinical Neuro-oncological Practice in India. Neurol India 69: 659-664.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Marcello M, Roberta L, Vincenzo BM, Simona B, Gioacchino T, et al. (2020)Assessing disability and relapses in multiple sclerosis on tele-neurology. Neurol Sci 41: 1369-1371.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Kimberly DB, Charlotte EJ, Stacy LP, Heather EM (2020)Evolution of the Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology and the Clinical Ophthalmology Literature: A 20-Year Retrospective. J Neuroophthalmol 40: 141-143.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Heather EM, Charlotte EJ, Daniel SR, Steven R (2019)Big Data Research in Neuro-Ophthalmology: Promises and Pitfalls. J Neuroophthalmol 39: 480-486.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref