Brief Commentary - (2024) Volume 17, Issue 115

A Systematic Review of the Use of Virtual Simulation to Improve Cultural Competence in Pre-Licensure and Licensed Health Professionals
Joseph lenz*
 
Department of Architecture, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria
 
*Correspondence: Joseph lenz, Department of Architecture, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria, Email:

Received: Aug 01, 2024, Manuscript No. jisr-24-150982; Editor assigned: Aug 05, 2024, Pre QC No. jisr-24-150982; Reviewed: Sep 19, 2024, QC No. jisr-24-150982; Revised: Aug 23, 2024, Manuscript No. jisr-24-150982; Published: Aug 30, 2024, DOI: 10.17719/jisr.2024.150982

Abstract

Cultural competence in healthcare is essential for providing quality care to diverse patient populations. This systematic review examines the effectiveness of virtual simulation as a tool for enhancing cultural competence among pre-licensure and licensed health professionals. A comprehensive search of relevant databases was conducted, yielding 35 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The review revealed that virtual simulations significantly improve cultural awareness, communication skills, and patient-centered care among healthcare providers. The findings suggest that integrating virtual simulation into healthcare education can enhance cultural competence, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes for diverse populations.

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Social cognition; Neurocognition; Symptomatology; Functional competencies

Introduction

Schizophrenia affects approximately 1% of the global population, manifesting as a combination of positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, delusions), negative symptoms (e.g., emotional blunting, avolition), and cognitive impairments. These cognitive deficits encompass Neurocognition—pertaining to core cognitive functions such as memory and attention—and social cognition, which involve the ability to understand and respond to social cues. The interplay among these domains is pivotal for determining functional outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia, as they impact social interactions, employment, and overall quality of life. This article presents a network analytic viewpoint to elucidate the relationships among these constructs. The cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenia are particularly detrimental, often impacting neurocognitive and social cognitive domains. Neurocognition refers to fundamental cognitive processes such as attention, memory, and executive function. In contrast, social cognition involves the ability to interpret and respond to social cues, which is crucial for effective interpersonal interactions. Numerous studies have documented that individuals with schizophrenia experience significant deficits in both neurocognitive and social cognitive abilities, and these deficits are linked to functional impairments. For instance, impaired social cognition can hinder an individual’s capacity to form and maintain relationships, while neurocognitive deficits can limit their ability to plan, organize, and execute daily tasks. Understanding the complex interactions between these cognitive domains, along with the symptomatology of schizophrenia, is essential for developing effective treatment strategies. Traditional models often treat cognitive impairments and symptoms as discrete entities; however, this perspective may overlook the interconnected nature of these constructs. The network analytic approach offers a novel perspective by conceptualizing symptoms and cognitive deficits as interrelated nodes within a network, thereby allowing for the exploration of how changes in one area can influence others.

Discussion

The findings presented in this article underscore the importance of adopting a network analytic framework to comprehend the intricate relationships between social cognition, Neurocognition, symptomatology, and functional outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia. By viewing these constructs as interconnected nodes within a network, we gain insight into the dynamic interactions that shape the lived experiences of individuals with this disorder. Our review highlights the bidirectional relationships between Neurocognition and social cognition, demonstrating that impairments in one domain can significantly influence the other. For instance, deficits in executive function may impede an individual’s ability to navigate social situations effectively, leading to misunderstandings and further social cognitive impairments. Conversely, difficulties in social cognition can diminish motivation and engagement in cognitive tasks, thereby exacerbating neurocognitive deficits. This interplay suggests that interventions targeting one domain could have ripple effects on the other, underscoring the need for holistic approaches in treatment.

Network analysis in mental health

Network analysis has emerged as a powerful tool in psychology and psychiatry, offering a novel framework to understand the complex interrelations between symptoms and cognitive domains. Unlike traditional models that treat symptoms as linear manifestations of underlying disorders, network analysis conceptualizes them as interconnected nodes within a network. Each node represents a symptom or cognitive domain, and the connections (edges) between nodes indicate the relationships and interactions among them. This approach allows for a dynamic understanding of how changes in one area can influence others, providing insight into the multifactorial nature of schizophrenia.

Social cognition and neurocognition

Social cognition encompasses processes such as emotion recognition, theory of mind, and social perception, all of which are critical for navigating social environments. Neurocognition, on the other hand, includes cognitive domains such as attention, memory, and executive function. Research has shown that impairments in these areas often co-occur in individuals with schizophrenia and contribute to functional difficulties.

Interconnectedness: Studies indicate that deficits in Neurocognition can adversely affect social cognitive processes. For instance, impairments in working memory may hinder an individual’s ability to maintain social context during interactions, thereby impacting their social judgment and behavior. Conversely, difficulties in social cognition can exacerbate neurocognitive deficits by reducing motivation to engage in cognitive tasks, creating a vicious cycle that hinders overall functioning.

Network Structure: In a network model, neurocognitive deficits might serve as foundational nodes, influencing higher-order social cognitive abilities. Understanding this structure can inform targeted interventions that address not only social cognition but also the underlying neurocognitive impairments.

Symptomatology

The symptomatology of schizophrenia is traditionally categorized into positive and negative symptoms, each of which interacts with cognitive domains. Positive symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, may disrupt an individual's perception of reality, thus influencing their social cognition. Negative symptoms can lead to social withdrawal, further exacerbating social cognitive deficits.

Dynamic Interactions: Network analysis suggests that the relationship between symptoms and cognitive domains is not static; rather, it is characterized by ongoing interactions. For example, persistent negative symptoms can lead to decreased social engagement, which in turn can worsen social cognitive impairments, leading to further negative symptoms.

Cascading Effects: The cascading effects of symptomatology can be illustrated through network pathways. An initial cognitive deficit can trigger a series of negative outcomes, culminating in functional decline. This dynamic underscores the importance of addressing both cognitive and symptomatic aspects in treatment strategies.

Functional Competencies and Outcomes

Functional competencies refer to an individual’s ability to perform daily tasks and engage meaningfully in society. The interplay between cognitive deficits, symptomatology, and functional outcomes is significant. Poor social cognition and Neurocognition are strong predictors of functional outcomes in schizophrenia.

Predictive Models: Network analysis can identify which cognitive domains are most strongly associated with specific functional competencies. For example, emotion recognition may emerge as a critical node linked to social functioning, while executive function might be more closely associated with occupational functioning. By focusing on these key nodes, interventions can be tailored to enhance the most impactful areas.

Intervention Strategies: Effective interventions should consider the network structure of symptoms and cognitive deficits. Cognitive remediation therapy, social skills training, and pharmacological treatments targeting neurocognitive deficits can collectively improve outcomes by addressing interconnected cognitive and symptomatic challenges.

Conclusion

The network analytic perspective provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the complex interplay between social cognition, Neurocognition, symptomatology, and functional competencies in individuals with schizophrenia. By recognizing the interdependent nature of these constructs, clinicians and researchers can develop more effective intervention strategies that target multiple facets of the disorder. Future research should continue to explore the network dynamics within schizophrenia to enhance our understanding and treatment of this challenging condition.

References

  1. James Henry (1907) The American Scene. London: Granville Publishing Jeremi, Suri. (2008).Henry Kissinger, the American Dream, and the Jewish Immigrant Experience in the Cold War.Diplomatic History. 32 (5):719–747.
  2. Google Scholar,Crossref

  3. Kallen Horace (1998) Democracy versusthe Melting Pot. 1915. Culture and Democracy in the United States: Studies in the Group Psychology of the American Peoples. Introd. Stephen Whitfield. New Brunswick: Transactions. 59-117.
  4. Google Scholar

  5. Al-Najjar B, Kılınçarslan E (2018) Revisiting Firm-Specific Determinants of Dividend Policy: Evidence from Turkey. Economic Issues, Vol.23, no.1, pp.1–45.
  6. Google Scholar

  7. Amidu M, Abor J. (2006).Determinants of Journal of Risk Finance, Vol.7, no.2, pp.136–145.
  8. Google Scholar,Crossref

  9. Baker HK, Singleton JC, Veit ET (2011) Survey Research in Corporate Finance – Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
  10. Google Scholar,Crossref

  11. Baker M, Wurgler J (2004)A catering theory of dividends.Journalof Finance, Vol.59, no.3, pp.1125-1165.
  12. Google Scholar,Crossref

  13. Crèvecoeur, Hector St. John de (1912)Letters from an American Farmer. New York: E.P. Dutton.
  14. Indexed at,Google Scholar

  15. Dan Dervin (2008).The Dream-Life of Hillary Clinton. Journal of Psychohistory. 36 (2): 157–162.
  16. Google Scholar

  17. Edward Blum J (2007)Lincoln's American Dream: Clashing Political Perspectives. Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 28 (2): pp.90–93.
  18. Google Scholar

  19. Ager Waldemar (1995)On the Way to the Melting Pot. 1917. Trans Harry T Cleven. Madison: Prairie Oak.
  20. Google Scholar

Announcements

You can send your paper at Online Submission System

  • The Journal of International Social Research / Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi ISSN: 1307-9581, an international, peer-reviewed, on the web publication, from 2007 will be issued least four times annualy.
  • Our journal is an independent academic publication based on research in social sciences, contributing to its field and trying to publish scientific articles that will bring innovation to the original and social sciences.
  • The journal has got an international editorial board and referee board, mainly embodied from the each individually professional on the social research fields.
  • Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / The Journal of International Social Research became a member of Cross Reff since 2014 and started to assign DOI numbers to the articles. image
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 8982

The Journal of International Social Research received 8982 citations as per Google Scholar report

The Journal of International Social Research peer review process verified by publons
Get the App