Brief Commentary - (2024) Volume 17, Issue 114

Environmental Impact of Extractive Industries: Production, Pollution, and Protest Across Global History
Alissa Rozan*
 
1Department of Sociology & Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, USA
 
*Correspondence: Alissa Rozan, Department of Sociology & Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, USA, Email:

Received: Jul 02, 2024, Manuscript No. jisr-24-146058; Editor assigned: Jul 05, 2024, Pre QC No. jisr-24-146058; Reviewed: Jul 19, 2024, QC No. jisr-24-146058; Revised: Jul 24, 2024, Manuscript No. jisr-24-146058; Published: Jul 31, 2024, DOI: 10.17719/jisr.2024. 146058

Abstract

Extractive industries, encompassing mining, oil, and gas operations, have been fundamental to economic development and technological progress. However, their environmental impact has been profound and multifaceted, influencing ecosystems, human health, and local communities. This article examines the historical trajectory of extractive industries, focusing on their production practices, pollution consequences, and the resultant social and environmental protests. By analyzing case studies from different global regions, this study highlights the evolution of regulatory frameworks and community resistance, providing insights into contemporary challenges and future directions for sustainable practices.

Introduction

Extractive industries, including mining, oil extraction, and natural gas drilling, have driven industrialization and economic growth worldwide. These industries extract valuable resources from the earth, but their activities have long been associated with significant environmental degradation. This article explores the environmental impacts of these industries throughout history, emphasizing production practices, pollution consequences, and the role of protests in shaping industry practices and policies. The origins of extractive industries can be traced back to ancient civilizations. The Egyptians, Romans, and Greeks practiced mining for metals such as gold, silver, and copper. These early methods were rudimentary, often involving surface mining and manual labor. The environmental impacts were relatively localized, with deforestation and soil erosion being common issues. The Industrial Revolution marked a significant shift in extractive industries. Advancements in technology and machinery enabled large-scale mining and drilling operations. The discovery of steam engines and railways facilitated the transportation of extracted materials, leading to intensified resource extraction. This period saw the widespread degradation of landscapes, increased pollution, and the beginning of large-scale environmental impacts.

Production practices and environmental impacts

Modern mining practices involve various techniques, including open-pit mining, underground mining, and mountaintop removal. Each method has distinct environmental impacts:

Open-pit mining: This technique removes large volumes of earth to access mineral deposits. It leads to extensive land degradation, loss of biodiversity, and water contamination from tailings.

Underground mining: While less disruptive on the surface, underground mining can cause subsidence, which damages ecosystems and infrastructure.

Mountaintop removal: Common in the Appalachian region of the United States, this method involves blasting off mountain tops to access coal seams, resulting in severe landscape alteration and ecological disruption.

Oil and gas extraction

Oil and gas extraction involves drilling wells to access hydrocarbon reserves. The environmental impacts include:

Oil spills: Accidental spills during drilling, transportation, or storage contaminate soil and water bodies, harming marine and terrestrial life.

Gas flaring: The burning of excess gas during extraction releases pollutants into the atmosphere, contributing to air pollution and climate change.

Hydraulic fracturing (fracking): This method uses high-pressure fluids to fracture rock formations and release oil or gas. It has been linked to groundwater contamination and increased seismic activity.

Pollution Consequences

Air pollution: Extractive industries release various pollutants, including particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and volatile organic compounds. These pollutants contribute to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases among local populations and exacerbate climate change through greenhouse gas emissions.

Water pollution: Mining and drilling operations can lead to acid mine drainage, where acidic water from mines leaches into rivers and streams, harming aquatic life. Oil spills and wastewater from hydraulic fracturing also contribute to water contamination, affecting both human and ecological health.

Soil degradation: Soil erosion, compaction, and contamination are common in areas affected by extractive industries. These changes can reduce soil fertility and disrupt local agriculture, impacting food security and livelihoods.

Protests and social movements

Early resistance: Early resistance to extractive industries often came from local communities affected by environmental degradation. Indigenous peoples and rural communities were among the first to protest against the adverse impacts of resource extraction on their lands and livelihoods.

Modern environmental movements

The 20th and 21st centuries saw the rise of global environmental movements. Notable protests include:

The battle of Bhopal (1984): The Union Carbide gas leak in Bhopal, India, led to widespread environmental and health crises, prompting international outcry and advocacy for stricter industrial regulations.

Amazon rainforest protests: Indigenous groups and environmental activists have protested against deforestation and mining in the Amazon, highlighting the global significance of preserving this critical ecosystem.

Contemporary activism

Today, environmental protests continue to address issues such as climate change, land rights, and pollution. Movements like Fridays for Future and Extinction Rebellion emphasize the need for sustainable practices and policies to mitigate the impacts of extractive industries.

Regulatory Responses and Future Directions

Historical regulation

Regulatory frameworks have evolved in response to environmental and social pressures. Early regulations were often inadequate, but over time, international agreements and national laws have strengthened environmental protections.

Current policies

Contemporary regulations focus on reducing environmental impacts, promoting transparency, and ensuring community participation. Initiatives such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) aim to enhance accountability in the sector.

Future Directions

Future directions for sustainable extractive industries include

Innovative technologies: Developing cleaner extraction technologies and practices to minimize environmental impacts.

Community engagement: Ensuring that local communities have a voice in decision-making processes and benefit from resource extraction activities.

Transition to renewables: Reducing reliance on fossil fuels and promoting the transition to renewable energy sources to mitigate climate change.

Conclusion

The environmental impact of extractive industries has been a significant issue throughout history. From early mining practices to modern oil and gas extraction, the consequences for ecosystems, human health, and local communities have been profound. Protests and social movements have played a crucial role in advocating for environmental justice and influencing regulatory changes. As the world moves towards more sustainable practices, continued efforts to address the legacy of extractive industries and promote responsible resource management will be essential for ensuring a healthier planet and equitable future.

References

  1. Martin K (2011)Electronic overload: The impact of excessive screen use on child and adolescent health and wellbeing. Perth, Western Australia: Dep Sport Recreat.
  2. Google Scholar

  3. Lucena JM, Cheng LA, Cavalcante TL, Silva VA, Farias Junior JC (2015)Prevalence of excessive screen time and associated factors in adolescents]. Revista paulista de pediatria: orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pidiatric de Sao Paulo33: 407-414.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Carson V, Pickett W, Janssen I (2011)Screen time and risk behaviours in 10 to16-year-old Canadian youth. Preventive Medicine 52: 99-103.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF (2010)Generation M Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-Year-Olds. Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation.
  8. Google Scholar

  9. Granich J, Rosenberg M, Knuiman MW, Timperio A (2011)Individual, social and physical environment factors associated with electronic media use among children: sedentary behavior at home. J Phys Act Health 8: 613.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  11. Rey-Lopez JP, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Ortega FB (2010)Sedentary patterns and media availability in European adolescents: The HELENA study. Prev Med 51: 50-55.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Wang C, Li K, Kim M, Lee S, Seo D-C (2019)Association between psychological distress and elevated use of electronic devices among US adolescents: Results from the youth risk behavior surveillance 2009-2017.Addictive Behaviors 90:112-118.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Strasburger VC, Hogan MJ, Mulligan DA (2013)Children adolescents, and the media. Pediatrics 132:958-961.
  16. Google Scholar

  17. Lobel A, Granic I, Stone LL, Engels RC (2014)Associations between children's video game playing and psychosocial health: information from both parent and child reports. Cyber psychology, Beh Social Net 17:639-643.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Mathers M, Canterford L, Olds T, Hesketh K, Ridley K et al. (2009)Electronic media use and adolescent health and well-being: cross-sectional community study.Academic Pediatrics 9: 307-314.
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref

Announcements

You can send your paper at Online Submission System

  • The Journal of International Social Research / Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi ISSN: 1307-9581, an international, peer-reviewed, on the web publication, from 2007 will be issued least four times annualy.
  • Our journal is an independent academic publication based on research in social sciences, contributing to its field and trying to publish scientific articles that will bring innovation to the original and social sciences.
  • The journal has got an international editorial board and referee board, mainly embodied from the each individually professional on the social research fields.
  • Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / The Journal of International Social Research became a member of Cross Reff since 2014 and started to assign DOI numbers to the articles. image
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 8982

The Journal of International Social Research received 8982 citations as per Google Scholar report

The Journal of International Social Research peer review process verified by publons
Get the App